On-chain research
We publish the cases we can document. Every transaction listed in these studies was re-fetched from the chain and checked by slot, timestamp and balance movement — not copied from a summary.
Each report states its own limits. Coordination is not ownership, and on-chain data alone cannot establish who controls a wallet.
Two seconds ahead: a Solana side wallet front-buying five launches
Five launches, five front-buys, one direct 20 SOL transfer. Here is the full evidence — transaction by transaction — and what it does and does not prove.
Read the evidence →
Smart wallets or swap routers? Reading contract flags on Robinhood Chain
A contract flag is not a trader-versus-router test. On Robinhood Chain, eight of the wallets we track all report as contracts — and all eight are ordinary accounts delegating to the same smart-account implementation.
Read the evidence →
Three wallets, 22 seconds: a funding trail that does not look independent
Four supposedly separate wallets, all of them funding and drawing from one wallet, mostly in round numbers — and three transfers landing inside 22 seconds. The transfers are verified on-chain; the conclusion is left to you.
Read the evidence →
Coordination or coincidence: why most of what we find is not evidence
Any clustering tool can draw you a graph. The useful question is how much of it survives scrutiny. So here is what our own detection produces — including the part we deliberately refuse to call evidence.
Read the evidence →
KOL wallets explained: side wallets, bundling and shilling on-chain
If you follow traders on X, here is what is happening on-chain underneath the timeline — with our real numbers, including the uncomfortable ones.
Read the evidence →
What goes into a case study
- Every transaction cited has a signature and slot we re-read from the chain.
- Recorded trade timestamps are marked separately from chain-verified ones.
- Aggregates are labelled as aggregates — never presented as a single transaction.
- Labels in our dataset are attribution, never treated as verified identity.
- A limitations section is mandatory. If the evidence is thin, we say so.