Three wallets, 22 seconds
Four supposedly separate wallets, all of them funding and drawing from one wallet, mostly in round numbers — and three transfers landing inside 22 seconds. The transfers are verified on-chain; the conclusion is left to you.
The addresses
Tracked wallet
8MaVa9kdt3NW…
8MaVa9kdt3NW4Q5HyNAm1X5LbR8PQRVDc1W8NMVK88D518 candidate links recorded · all four wallets below also share an exit destination
Open the cluster report →Largest counterparty
FfyLxGLJu6Wn…
FfyLxGLJu6WnCMahP9AKEDkC3VFWRvcH8wUx42CQTGhB14 recorded transfers, 573 SOL total
Open the cluster report →What the data shows
Three transfers, three wallets, 22 seconds
On 2026-07-29 three different addresses sent to the tracked wallet within 22 seconds of each other: 50 SOL at 21:22:55, 50 SOL at 21:23:05 and 20 SOL at 21:23:17. The three transactions occupy slots 436023030, 436023053 and 436023083 — close enough that whoever controlled them acted, or was triggered, in the same moment.
The money moved both ways
This is not one-directional funding. Some of the largest transfers run from the tracked wallet out to these addresses — 110 SOL, 75 SOL and 50.15 SOL among them. Money circulating in both directions between addresses is harder to explain as a one-off payment than a single transfer would be.
Round numbers, repeated amounts
The transfers are dominated by round figures: 110, 75, 50, 40, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5 SOL. Repeating round amounts across four different counterparties is the shape of a manual or scripted funding routine rather than ordinary trading flows.
All four also share an exit destination
Each of the four links carries a shared-exit signal in addition to the transfers, meaning funds from these wallets and the tracked wallet consolidate at the same destination. Combined with the timing, the independence of the four addresses is the thing that stops being plausible.
The 22-second window (all chain-verified)
Verified: tracked wallet +50 SOL, counterparty −50.000205 SOL.
Verified: tracked wallet +50 SOL, counterparty −50.000205 SOL. Ten seconds after the transfer above.
Verified: tracked wallet +20 SOL, counterparty −20.000205 SOL. Twelve seconds after the transfer above.
Largest single transfers, re-checked one by one
Verified: tracked wallet −110.000080 SOL, counterparty +110 SOL.
Verified: tracked wallet +110 SOL, counterparty −110.000080 SOL. A near mirror of the transfer above, two weeks later.
Verified: tracked wallet −75.000080 SOL, counterparty +75 SOL.
Verified: tracked wallet +40 SOL, counterparty −40.000006 SOL.
What our recorded evidence says about each of the four
| Counterparty | Recorded transfers | Recorded total | Shared exit | Front-buys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWiNYzgn…93oms | 20 legs | 476 SOL | yes | 1 |
| PUMPRLSw…1scdS | 7 legs | 156 SOL | yes | 1 |
| HodLXSGK…7URvd | 6 legs | 85 SOL | yes | — |
| FfyLxGLJ…QTGhB | 14 legs | 573 SOL | yes | — |
Totals are aggregates across legs recorded by our pipeline, in both directions — not single transactions. We re-fetched the largest legs above and the amounts matched exactly.
Limitations
- •This is evidence of coordination, not proof of common ownership. On-chain data cannot establish who controls an address.
- •The transfer totals are aggregates across multiple recorded legs in both directions, not the value of a single transaction.
- •Only the specific legs listed above were re-fetched and verified by us; the remaining legs behind the totals were not independently re-checked.
- •Wallets funding each other is normal behaviour between collaborators, funds, or a person moving their own money. It is not by itself evidence of wrongdoing.
- •Nothing in this report should be read as a legal conclusion or an accusation of unlawful activity.
Check it yourself
Each signature opens on Solscan with its slot and timestamp. Compare the balance movements listed here against what the chain shows; the figures should match exactly.